February 4, 2011

Week9_Augustine_Oleru_ Project Management Training Options for Nigerian Engineers

Week9_Augustine_Oleru_ Project Management Training Options for Nigerian Engineers

Problem Statement
WHAT IS THE BEST PROJECT MANAGEMENT TRAINING OPTIONS FOR NIGERIAN ENGINEERS?

Over the years, Nigerian Engineers that handles Nigerian projects are found be inexperience and less productive. Most of the executed projects done by these engineers suffer immense dilapidation and deformation. Hence, this situation poses a great trait to industries where these engineers deliver their services. Therefore, it calls for mandatory training for all Nigerian engineers.
on this work we are going to look at different project management trainings and certifications options with the view of selecting the best fit using best practice.


Alternatives

For this paper, we are going to look at three training certification programs that can be of immense advantage to the project professionals in Nigeria.

1. PMI’s PMP This credential is a very important industry-recognized certification for project managers. Globally recognized and demanded, the PMP® demonstrates that you have the experience, education and competency to successfully lead and direct projects.
Nigeria engineers will require this type of project management training in order to be more efficient and effective in carrying out engineering & project services.

2. AACE’s CCC/CCE This certification has distinguished cost and management professionals who have the knowledge and skills that impact the bottom line. AACE certification ensures a high quality standard over the years in project management.

3. Aus-CPPM. This is a high standard Australian based project management certification (Certified Practising Project Manager)

Developing Outcomes
Scoring Model for selection (using Spread sheet solution)

QUALITY

1) Work experience requirements;

2) Formal educational requirements

3) Examination for knowledge

4) Assessment process used to determine competency.

COST

1) Total Certification Fee.

2) Cost of books

INTERNTIONAL RECOGNITION/ACCEPTABILITY

Quality

SN

Comparable criteria

PMI’s PMP

AACE’s CCC/CCE

Aus-CPPM

1

Work experience requirements;

4500

8000

6000

2

Formal educational requirements (B.Sc)

5000

5000

5000

3

Formal educational requirements (M.Sc)

0

0

0

3

Examination for knowledge

35

0

0

4

Assessment process used to determine competency.

85

210

0

6

Level of effort required for preparation

4

7

0

TOTAL

9624

13217

13000

Cost

1

Total Certification Fee + Membership Fee (USD)

525

475

463.52

2

Cost of Books (USD)

50

130

TOTAL

575

605

463.52


Recognition /acceptability

1

On scale of 1-10

7

8

4

TOTAL

7

8

4


Analysis and Comparison of alternatives

This is done on Additive weighting technique.

The weighted ratings of the three main criteria of quality, cost, and acceptability- On weighting ration

Criteria Weighting

Quality

Cost

Recognition

Total Ranking

45%

35%

20%

Ranking Value

Weighted Value

Ranking Value

Weighted Value

Ranking Value

Weighted Value

PMI’s PMP

27

12.15

31

10.85

37

7.4

30.4

AACE’s CCC/CCE

37

16.65

30

10.5

42

8.4

35.55

Aus-CPPM

36

16.2

39

13.65

20

4

33.85



I. The best alternative is the one with the highest ranking of higher quality lower cost and higher recognition and acceptability. In this case the AACE’s CCC/CCE.

Conclusion and Recommendation
To combat project management deficiencies in the country, we need to provide structured world class training and certifications for our engineers and project people, And from the result of the analysis option 2 (AACE’s CCC/CCE) is most preferred
.

Reference

Engineering Economy, 14th Edition, CH 6 ; by William G. Sullivan
Project Management Credentials Compared - A Preliminary Analysis By Paul D. Giammalvo, PhD
Everyday project management. C.C Akagha 2009

PMP Credential Handbook revised feb1 2011by PMI incl.

2 comments:

  1. Hmmmmmm.......... Augustine, you are doing a MUCH better job and the only reason you didn't at least earn an EXCELLENT posting was because your made an incomplete analysis.

    The first KILLER is that PMI's PMP infers COMPETENCY. Where did you find that? I seriously doubt you will find anything written by PMI that makes that claim. When you apply for your PMP, the only thing that PMI audits is your claim of hours worked. Nothing about whether the project you worked on was a success or not, or not even if the role you played contributed to the success or failure of the project.

    Secondly, you missed two of the MAJOR competitors to the PMP- APM/OGC's PRINCE2 and AIPM's competency based credentials. I know for a fact that because of the strong link between Nigeria and the UK that PRINCE2 is established in Nigeria. So why did you not bother to include that in your analysis? Surely PRINCE2 is much more recognized in Nigeria than is AIPM's RegPM?

    Then had you done your homework, you would realize that next to PMI's PMP, the next most popular credential is IPMA's credentials. IPMA is more than 5 times more "common" than are the AACE credentials.

    So while I will accept this weeks posting, I will expect an UPDATE that includes PRINCE2 and IPMA's credentials. (You can drop AIPM as they have just joined IPMA)

    On a related note, you may want to also consider exploring the PMI and AACE models vs the IPMA model...... For a developing nation, ONLY IPMA offers the ability to create an almost wholly INDEPENDENT Nigerian NATIONAL organization..... So instead of being tied closely to American organizations via PMI or AACE, being required to adhere to US laws and customs, IPMA provides Nigerian practitioners to create your OWN independent country organization and then instead of being a subset ("slave") to PMI or AACE, by forming your own professional organization under IPMA, you are free to negotiate PEER TO PEER relationships with PMI and/or AACE.

    Something to give some serious thought to as you evolve, and something I encourage my Indonesian and other developing nations to give serious consideration to.

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

    ReplyDelete
  2. PS: I want to be clear- the PROCESS you are using is EXCELLENT- just what I am looking for. What you missed were the "FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES" and a comparison based on the facts.

    And I am honestly not sure if your recommendation will stand or not...... But the ANALYSIS is a critical one and very important to the future of Nigeria, so continue your postings on this topic in the coming weeks.

    ReplyDelete